Portrait photography has a very important place in the history photography as it was its' first great commercial success as the huge popularity of the carte de visite in the 1850's, where small photographic portraits were used as calling cards, or as collector cards of the great and good.(Badger,G 2007)
It was not until I started to research portrait photography for this assignment that I realized that it was such a complicated and contentious issue. The debate seems to revolve around what should and does a photographic portrait, portray.We have all heard terms like "the eyes are the window to the soul" and that a portrait should capture the character or the secret inner being of the sitter, but David Bailey(1938-) states that " should you set out to portray ' inner character' in a photographic portrait you will find aim is a will-o'-the-wisp"(Hughes,G 1981). He carries on to say that the best you can hope to achieve is a caricature of the subject and that by close examination of the sitter the photographer should try to exaggerate their prominent features or gestures.This seems a rather shallow approach and seems unlikely to achieve a flattering result. Here we must remember that Bailey is a celebrity portrait photographer so his subjects are well known and so the public have a preconceived perception of them that Bailey has to deliver, they come with a back story. This highlights the two types of portrait, the society and the social, the society relates to the portraits of the aristocracy and high achievers and the social is of the man in the street. If we look at some of the social portraits of the past, such as those of August Sander(1876-1964), Walker Evans(1903-1975) or Paul Strand(1886-1976), we have no idea who the subjects are, we can make assumptions from the attached titles and their clothes and surroundings but we are unlikely to find out their names or backgrounds, we therefore see them as types. If we take Strands' Young Boy, Gondeville,France 1951 as an example.
Young Boy,Gondeville,France 1951 |
The camera is seen as a very impassive tool, " the camera never lies", so does that mean with these social portraits that the photographer has no effect on the outcome, Strand chose this particular boy, possibly told him to stand in front of the old wooden building, possibly to get out of the sun, maybe for effect. Even with the secret, candid portraits taken by both Strand and Evans, they both still chose their subjects. In Evans' famous series of New York subway pictures he took truly candid pictures of his fellow travelers in an attempt to capture unposed portraits, because it is the pose that which the photographer is trying to strip away, as Roland Barthes(1915-1980) states, " once I feel myself being observed by the lens, everything changes: I constitute myself in the process of "posing," I instantaneously make another body for myself , I transform myself in advance into an image."( Barthes,R 1993)
Subway Passengers, New York City, 1938 |
Generally when we take a portrait we will try to influence its outcome, even at its most basic who has not been asked to smile for the camera, the problem with this approach is that it reinforces the "pose", how do we get beyond this. The most important thing is that the photographer must maintain control of the situation and then use that control to their advantage, the aim is to get the sitter to drop their public face, I do not think that any of the best portrait photographers would claim to uncover anyones' soul, Irving Penn(1917-2009) wrote " In portrait photography there is something more profound that we seek inside a person, while being painfully aware that a limitation of our medium is that the inside is record able only insofar as it is apparent on the outside . . . I have at times seduced myself into a mystical belief in the penetrative power of the camera, but reflection always brings me back to accepting the picture process as simply the bounce back of light from a momentary arrangement of atoms that are a face.But that is not to say the power of a tender word, or a clumsy one, to affect those atoms, can be overstated. When light and the situation of the portrait picture are found and the sculptural arrangement made, it may be that the word is after all at the heart of the whole thing . . . Very often what lies behind the facade is rare and wonderful than the subject knows or dares to believe." (Keaney,M 2010).
Portraitists have different methods of getting a subject to drop their facade, Penn would make a session last until his sitter was too tired to keep it up, Richard Avedon (1946-2004) would sometimes use the same trick or he would quickly shock his sitters with a few words. He said to the anti-Semitic poet Ezra Pound, " I think you should know Mr Pound, that I'm Jewish " as he took his pictures, he did something similar to the dog loving Duke and Duchess of Windsor, telling them " I'm sorry I'm late. My taxi hit a dog." (Lahr,J 2008)
Wallis, Duchess of Windsor; Edward Duke of Windsor, 1957 |
Lastly I want to look at the way Diane Arbus took her portraits , she told one of her students she would " stop at nothing to get the picture I wanted." and then this from Germaine Greer " She kept asking me all sorts of personal questions, and I became aware that she would only shoot when my face was showing tension or concern or boredom or annoyance ( and there was plenty of that, let me tell you), . . . It was tyranny. Really tyranny. Diane Arbus ended up straddling me- this frail little person kneeling, keening over my face. I felt completely terrorized by the blasted lens. It was a helluva struggle. Finally I decided. " Damn it, you're not going to do this to me, lady. I'm not going to be photographed like one of your freaks! " So I stiffened my face like a mask. Diane went right on merrily photographing- clickclickclickclick- cajoling me, teasing me, flattering me. This frail rosepetal creature kept at me like a laser beam. . . . It was a battle between us. Who won? It was a draw. After that afternoon I never saw her again. I never saw the photographs either."
All of this bullying and cajoling and wearing down to the point of fatigue, might give us interesting portraits but does it show us the true person, or just a scared, bored or tired person. Or can we never really capture a person in a photograph, will any portrait only ever be as Barthes states ' a likeness of another likeness ad ifinitum '
As I stated earlier I have taken a series of portraits of my daughter to see the effect of different types of lighting.
Covered Alley, Side Lighting |
Covered Alley |
Silhouette at the Bus Stop |
In Shade, In Hall just inside front Door |
Large Window, Gold Reflector |
Flash Head, Barn Doors, No Diffusion |
Rim Light, Undiffused flash |
Single Flash, No Diffuser |
Facing out 6 feet from patio door |
Single Flash, Diffuser |
not bearing her soul, but its a start.
Smiling |
What I have learnt from this assignment is that portraiture is a very complicated subject and that just when I feel I have grasped all the different arguments and implications there seems to be another twist to throw things back into confusion again, and when I look back at this blog in a few days or weeks time I will think of all the things I meant to say and haven't.
As for lighting portraits, I have so much to learn.
One last picture, this was why Hope was so upset down at the bus stop in front of all the shoppers.
Oh the Shame for a Thirteen Year Old |
Badger,G,2007,The genius of Photography,Quadrille,London.
Hughes,G,1981,David Baileys Book of Photography,J M Dent & Sons,London.
Barthes,R,1993,Camera Lucida,Vintage,London.
Bosworth,P,2005,Diane Arbus A Biography,Vintage,London.
Hoffman,M,1976,Paul Strand Sixty Years of Photographs,Aperture,New York.
Keaney,M,2010,Irving Penn Portraits,National Portrait Gallery Publications,London.
Lahr,J,2008,Performance Richard Avedon,Abrams,New York.
Prakel,D,2007.Lighting,AVA,Switzerland.
Hunter,F,Biver,S,Fuqua,P,2007,Light Science & Magic, An Introduction to Photographic Lighting,Focal Press,Oxford.